Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Excel Sports International - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5784 of 2021
Decided On : 03-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impugned order blacklisting petitioner for one year (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of show cause notice (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court sets aside order & offers fresh procedure (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. petition disposed of with order details (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
CM APPLN. 18137-38/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 5784/2021 & CM APPLN. 18136/2021 (stay)
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner impugns order dated 31.03.2021 (allegedly received on 22.05.2021) whereby petitioner has been blacklisted for a period of one year from participating in any tender work of SDMC.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter-alia, contends that prior to issuance of the subject order no show cause notice was given to the petitioner, putting the petitioner to notice that a possible action of blacklisting is proposed against the petitioner. It is contended that a notice dated 01.12.2020 was issued, however, the notice did not specifically state that an action of blacklisting was proposed against the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-SDMC appearing on advance notice, on instructions of Mr. Sanjay Hingorani, Executive Engineer, Sanitary Land Fields (SLF), submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions, impugned order dated 31.03.2021 as well as show cause notice dated 01.12.2020 be deemed to have been withdrawn, reserving the right of the Respondent to issue fresh show cause notice.
5. In view of the above, impugned order dated 31.03.2021 and show cause notice dated 01.12.2020 are set aside reserving the right of the respondent to issue a fresh show cause notice in accordance with law.
6. On receipt of the show cause notice, petitioner shall file a response thereto within one week. Thereafter respondent shall be at liberty to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. Keeping in view the present prevailing situation, personal hearing may be granted over video conferencing.
7. All rights and contentions of parties are reserved.
8. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
9. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.
The court reaffirmed the requirement of notice and opportunity for a hearing before punitive actions such as blacklisting can be imposed, upholding the principles of natural justice.
Procedural fairness and the requirement of a specific show cause notice before taking action such as blacklisting.
The court emphasized the importance of providing a clear and proper opportunity to the party being blacklisted to explain and take remedial measures before being debarred or blacklisted.
The court emphasized the need for strict observance of the principles of natural justice before passing an order of blacklisting and highlighted the requirement of a valid, particularised, and unambi....
A valid blacklisting order requires clear communication of intent and grounds, ensuring the affected party's right to a fair opportunity to respond.
The severity of the effects of blacklisting and the resultant need for strict observance of the principles of natural justice before passing an order of blacklisting.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
