Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Nidhi Badhani (WG CDR) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. denial of permanent commission and pending application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments against denial of permanent commission. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. balance of convenience favors respondents. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. dismissal of the petition based on merits. (Para 10) |
ORDER
CM Nos.18433/2021, 18434/2021, 18435/2021 & 18436/2021 (all for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.
2. The applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5871/2021 and CM No. 18432 (for directions)
3. The petitioner, a Short Service Commission (SSC) Officer in the respondents Indian Air Force (IAF) and whose maximum period of SSC of 15 years is lapsing on 17th June, 2021, aggrieved from denial of Permanent Commission, has filed OA No.185/2020 before the Principal Bench, New Delhi of Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) and which OA No.185/2020 is pending consideration and listed next on 20th July, 2021.
4. The petitioner filed MA No.959/2021 in the aforesaid OA, seeking stay of her discharge from the respondents IAF, scheduled for 17th June, 2021.
5. AFT, vide impugned order dated 28th May, 2021, though has issued notice of the aforesaid application/MA No.959/2021 to the respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
