SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Intertek India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed for rectification direction (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding respondent's inaction on rectification (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. respondent allowed the rectification application (Para 7)
4. court orders refund payment to petitioner (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's rectification application for the assessment year 2015-16 dated 24th November, 2020 within a period of four weeks. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondent to issue consequential refunds as determined by the respondent along with statutory and other interest within the same period.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the errors pointed out in the rectification application dated 24th November, 2020 are mere computation mistakes apparent on the face of the record as provided under Section 154(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') and the same have not been disputed by the respondent till date. He further states that the respondent did pass a rectification order dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top