SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Giesecke and Devrient Ms India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax OSD Range 10 – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for timely disposal of rectification application. (Para 1)
2. dispute over income tax demand and rectification responsibilities. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court's directive for timely resolution of the petition. (Para 5)
4. publication of the court's order. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The hearing has been done by way of video conferencing.

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to dispose of the Petitioner's rectification application for Assessment Year 2017-18 dated 12th April, 2019 within a specified period of four weeks and not to recover the wrongful demand by any means, until 30 days after the disposal of the rectification application.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] a demand for Rs. 6,40,47,590/- was erroneously determined to be payable due to disallowance under section 43B, short-grant of TDS Credit, and levy of consequential interests. He states that the respondent has failed to discharge its duties as mandated by law, by not rectifying the mistakes made by it in Section 143(1) intimation dated 28th April, 2019 for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top