SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court's acknowledgment of procedural matters. (Para 1 , 4)
2. request for processing tax return and refund. (Para 2 , 3)
3. direction for resolving rectification application. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.: (Oral)

C.M.No.6177/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.2156/2022

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to process the return of income, issue correct computation as well as issue refund along with up-to-date interest for the assessment year 2019-20.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no scrutiny assessment was undertaken for the year under consideration. She states that the petitioner's return of income has been processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act'). She, however, states that an intimation under Section 245 of the Act was issued by the respondents to adjust the said refund against erroneous demand raised for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2017-18. She further states that the said erroneous demand has now

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top