SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Jyoti Sarup Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Executive Engineer-XXIII, South Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act'), inter alia, praying that an arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with the agreement dated 21.11.2006 (hereinafter `the Agreement') entered into by the petitioner with the respondent (hereinafter `SDMC') for executing the works relating to "Improvement to Drainage System and Roads Ready Mix Concrete in Ward No. C-47 & 48 in the West Zone" falling under the Executive Engineer-XXIII, MC Primary School, 10 Block, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi-110027.

2. In terms of the Agreement, SDMC awarded the contract for execution of the works in question to the petitioner at a contract price of Rs.25,30,28,517/- In terms of the tender conditions, SDMC called upon the petitioner to deposit the performance security in the form of a Bank Guarantee for an amount of Rs.1,02,00,000/-, which is equivalent to 5% of the contract price. The Agreement stipulated 06.12.2006 as the commencement date and 05.12.2008 as the date of completion of the works.

3. The petitioner completed th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top