Sunehari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs Airports Authority of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Sunehari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Airports Authority of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. factual background of dispute resolution process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. contextual details on claims referred to drc and arbitrator. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
3. arguments against the referral of additional claims. (Para 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. discussion on the limits of arbitrator's jurisdiction. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. importance of adhering strictly to arbitration clauses. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
6. court's decision to dismiss the petition. (Para 34)

JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J.

1. By way of the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called "The Act"), the petitioner seeks appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the additional disputes between the parties. The petitioner has alternatively prayed for reference of additional disputes/claims no. 6 and 7 to the Learned sole arbitrator, already appointed vide letter dated 13.12.2021.

2. Facts in brief are that the respondent had floated a tender for execution of the work of "Construction of Central Air Traffic Flow Management (CATFM) and Associated offices at Vasant Kunj, New Delhi". Petitioner was declared as successful participant in the tender and was aw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMINI PUSHKARNASunehari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd. – AppellantVersusAirports Authority of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Sunehari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Airports Authority of India – Respondent