Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
V.K. Dewan & Co. – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Jal Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract execution and initial disputes (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. arbitration appointment and procedural challenges (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. limitations and estoppel in claims (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. cause of action and withdrawal effects (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. application of limitation periods (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. court's refusal to refer ex facie time-barred claims (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. final dismissal of the petition (Para 33 , 34) |
Mini Pushkarna, J.
1. The present is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as "Act") for appointment of an Arbitrator.
2. Facts relevant for the present case are that a contract was executed between the parties on 09.10.2000 for work of construction of Underground Reservoir and Booster Pumping Station at Surajmal Vihar, Trans Yamuna, Delhi. Time period for execution of the contract was extended several times by respondent and the said work was completed by petitioner on 31.01.2005. Completion certificate was issued by the respondent - Delhi Jal Board to the petitioner on 01.03.2005.
3. After completion of the work
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
