Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Komal Narula – Appellant
Versus
DMI Finance Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discusses the context of the arbitral award. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. describes the factual background regarding loan agreements. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against lack of notice. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. respondents' arguments regarding the notice served. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 5. court's observation on service of notices. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 44) |
| 6. court's decision to set aside the award against the petitioner. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 7. final order and disposal of the petition. (Para 49) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 01.05.2016 (hereinafter `the impugned award') passed by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a learned Sole Arbitrator.
2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to a Common Loan Agreement dated 14.01.2015.
3. By the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has partly accepted the claims preferred by the respondents. The Arbitral Tribunal has acc
The requirement of proper notice in arbitration proceedings is paramount, and failure to prove adequate service of notice undermines the validity of the arbitral award.
Arbitration - Set-aside of Arbitral Award - Service of notice - There is no evidence or any material to indicate that petitioner had refused service of notice sent to her at her address.
Due notice in arbitral proceedings is essential for validity; lack of proper service violates principles of natural justice.
Arbitration Award - Service of Notice - Notices were returned with remarks ‘left’ and therefore same did not constitute a due service of notice as required under bye-law 287 of the bye-laws of DSE. N....
The court ruled that a notice invoking arbitration is deemed served if dispatched to the correct address, and disputes cannot be dismissed on limitation grounds when evidence suggests ongoing acknowl....
The main legal point established is the limited scope of examination under Section 11 of the A&C Act, which focuses solely on the existence of an arbitration agreement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notice under Section 21 of the A&C Act must be received for the arbitration to commence, claims must be initiated within the limitation pe....
A unilateral right of appointment for an arbitrator in an arbitration agreement is impermissible; however, notice of intent to arbitrate, even when lacking technical precision, can suffice for procee....
Disputes concerning alleged payments are referable to arbitration despite claims of prior resolution efforts, where the existence of disputes was upheld.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
