Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Anil Kumar Singh Bhadoria – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. overview of ccim's initial decisions and complaints. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal standing of individual teachers based on experiences. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. discussion on regulatory compliance and implications. (Para 22 , 25 , 264) |
| 5. arguments on the implications of the decisions on teaching faculty. (Para 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 6. final conclusion and directive for re-evaluation. (Para 270) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
CM No. 5401/2021 (for exemption) in W.P.(C) 1870/2021
CM No. 5473/2021 (for exemption) in W.P.(C) 1881/2021
CM No. 6874/2021 (for exemption) in W.P.(C) 2351/2021
CM No. 13803/2021 (for exemption) in W.P.(C) 4518/2021
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 837/2021
W.P.(C) 1113/2021
W.P.(C) 1155/2021
W.P.(C) 1158/2021
W.P.(C) 1214/2021
W.P.(C) 1215/2021
W.P.(C) 1226/2021
W.P.(C) 1271/2021
W.P.(C) 1339/2021
W.P.(C) 1352/2021
W.P.(C) 1373/2021
W.P.(C) 1855/2021
W.P.(C) 1870/2021
W.P.(C) 1881/2021
W.P.(C) 2351/2021
W.P.(C) 2621/2021
W.P.(C) 2762/2021
W.P.(C) 4167/2021
W.P.(C) 4234/2021
W.P.(C) 4263/2021
W.P.(C) 4518/2021
1. Vide this common order I sh
The CCIM can certify teaching faculty's presence at specific institutions under Regulation 3(1)(f), ensuring they are not practicing elsewhere, and compliance with Regulation 26 is necessary for main....
Employment and Service matter - Ayurveda Teacher - There is no provision disqualifying any Ayurveda Teacher from practice of teaching on ground that his registration as a medical practitioner is from....
The Court has the power to mould the relief in accordance with changed circumstances for shortening litigation, or doing complete justice, when relief which may have been justified at the commencemen....
The court emphasized the necessity of fair hearings and proper consideration of evidence in regulatory decisions affecting educational institutions, ruling against arbitrary penalties and restriction....
The judgment established the importance of adhering to the minimum eligibility criteria as per the regulations and highlighted the need for procedural fairness in administrative decisions.
The denial of permission to establish an Ayurvedic Medical College was deemed unjustified due to lack of substantiated deficiencies, emphasizing the importance of function and regulation compliance.
The court emphasized the need to encourage institutes with necessary infrastructure for running ayurvedic medical colleges to contribute to strengthening the infrastructure of the system of medicine ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the authorities must conduct proper verification and provide the inspection report to the concerned parties before drawing adverse inferences ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
