SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5047

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Vivek College of Ayurvedic Science And Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 4033 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 3771 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3789 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3798 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3804 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3832 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3833 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4027 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4123 of 2021, W.P.(C) 8635 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4053 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4064 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4113 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4118 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4119 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4122 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4124 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4126 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4127 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4130 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4133 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4170 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4287 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4242 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4277 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4445 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4279 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4408 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4509 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4572 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4602 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4626 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4637 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4650 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4685 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4708 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4754 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4819 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4983 of 2021, W.P.(C) 5964 of 2021, W.P.(C) 7449 of 2021, W.P.(C) 7513 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 12650 of 2021
Decided On : 31-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee & Mr. Swapnil Pattanayak, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. Mariarputham, Senior Advocate with Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Animesh Kumar, Mr. Nishant Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Gupta & Ms. Rushali Agarwal, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Siddharth Mittal & Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Singh & Mr. Pratap Shanker, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Devyani Ashra & Mr. Utkarsh Kaushik, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shantanu Parashar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General, for the UOI.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, for the UOI.
Mr. Vijay Joshi & Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Mr. Kartikey Singh & Mr. Ashutosh Jain, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Ms. Nidhi Mittal & Mr. Ojaswa Pathak, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, Mr. Sarthak Anand & Mr. Kunal Seth, Advocates, for the Respondent.
Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, Senior Panel Counsel, for the UOI.
Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advocate, for the UOI.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the UOI.
Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar & Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Advocate, for the UOI.
Ms. Monika Arora, Mr. Yogesh Panwar & Ms. Manpreet Kaur Bhasin, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Danish Faraz Khan, Advocate, for the UOI.
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Govt. Counsel with Mr. Anirudh Shukla, Advocate, for UOI.
Mr. Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Advocate, for Shri Krishna AYUSH University, Kurukshetra.
Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Anirudh Shukla, Govt. Pleader & Ms. Samiksha, Advocate, for the UOI.
Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Zubin Singh, Advocate, for the UOI.
Ms. Manisha Aggarwal Narain, CGSC with Ms. Rakshita Goyal & Mr. Aditya Deshwal, Advocates, for the UOI.
Ms. Divya Kapur, Advocate (Govt. Pleader) and Mr. Jitender Kumar Panchal, Advocate, for the Respondent.
Mr. Ajay Jain and Ms. Tannu, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Panel Counsel, for the UOI with Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the Respondent.
Mr. Neeraj Sahaj, Mr. Vedansh & Mr. Rudra, Advocates, for the UOI.
Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena and Mr. Ramneek Mishra, Advocatess, for the UOI.
Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, Central Govt. Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Kautilya Birat, Advocate, for the Respondent.
Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak, Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Mr. Pushpander Singh Charak & Mr. Kapil Gaur, Advocates, for the UOI.
Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Mr. Kumar Prashant, Mr. Parmod Kumar Vishnoi & Mr. Avnish Dave, Advocates, for the NCISM/CCIM.

The Court has the power to mould the relief in accordance with changed circumstances for shortening litigation, or doing complete justice, when relief which may have been justified at the commencement of the litigation, would become inappropriate due to changed circumstances

Headnote:

The Court set aside the impugned decisions of the Union of India and permitted the petitioners to continue with the admission of the students who were admitted pursuant to the interim orders passed by the Court.

Fact of the Case:

The batch of writ petitions concerned orders of the Union of India [hereinafter, "the Union"] declining permission to the petitioner-institutions to admit students in their Ayurveda/Unani Colleges for the academic session 2020-2021.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the impugned orders were unsustainable in law and that the petitioners were entitled to a consequential order continuing the students who had already been admitted.

Issues: Whether the impugned orders of the Union of India declining permission to the petitioner-institutions to admit students in their Ayurveda/Unani Colleges for the academic session 2020-2021 were sustainable in law.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the impugned orders were unsustainable in law because they were based on the non-certification of individual teachers under Regulation 3(1)(f) of the 2016 Regulations, which had been set aside by the Court in Anil Kumar Singh Bhadoria [Ibid]. The Court also held that the petitioners were entitled to a consequential order continuing the students who had already been admitted because they had been admitted pursuant to interim orders passed by the Court and because the impugned orders had been set aside.

Final Decision: The Court set aside the impugned decisions of the Union of India and permitted the petitioners to continue with the admission of the students who were admitted pursuant to the interim orders passed by the Court.

JUDGMENT

1. This batch of writ petitions concerns orders of the Union of India [hereinafter, "the Union"] declining permission to the petitioner-institutions to admit students in their Ayurveda/Unani Colleges for the academic session 2020-2021.

A. Background:

2. For many of the petitioners, this is the third or fourth round of challenge before this Court in this connection.

3. Litigation first commenced at the stage of consideration of the petitioners' applications for permission to admit students. Writ petitions were filed in view of delays in disposal of the applications, particularly where counselling for admission was in progress, and the Court passed necessary directions in this regard.

4. In the next round of litigation, the petitioners challenged earlier show cause notices/orders of the Union, rejecting their applications either fully or partially [i.e., permitting admissions of fewer students than sought by the institution]. Although this Court originally declined interim relief by an order dated 01.02.2021 in one of those writ petitions [W.P. (C) 1265/2021], the matter was carried in appeal, and the Division Bench, by an order dated 04.02.2021 [LPA No. 49/2021, Shivang Homeopathic College vs. Union of India & Others], directed as follows:

    "9. In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the appellant has made out a prima facie case in its favour for grant of interim relief. Balance of convenience is also in favour of the appellant. If the appellant is not permitted by way of interim relief to participate in the ongoing counselling, irreparable harm and injury shall be caused to the appellant.

    10. We, therefore, stay the operation, implementation and execution of the order of the learned Single Judge dated 01.02.2021 passed in WP(C) No.1265/2021, till the next date of hearing.

    11. We hereby direct that the appellant shall be permitted to participate in the counselling process which is ongoing in the State of Madhya Pradesh as pointed out by the learned senior counsel for the appellant."

5. Following the aforesaid order of the Division Bench, this Court granted similar interim relief to several of the petitioners in the earlier round of litigation, after examination of a prima facie case. It may be mentioned that, by an order dated 26.04.2021, LPA 49/2021 was ultimately disposed of by the Division Bench, in terms of the modalities outlined in a "Status Note" dated 01.03.2021 [hereinafter, "the Status Note"], which is discussed below. The respondent authorities accepted the Division Bench order dated 04.02.2021, and subsequent orders of this Court. However, while disposing of the appeal, the Division Bench made it clear that the interim order dated 04.02.2021 was passed in the facts and circumstances of the particular case, and in view of the disposal of the appeal, the said interim order was also no longer in existence.

6. Having regard to the large number of cases, and to the fact that continued litigation would ultimately lead to uncertainty and confusion, both for the institutions and for the students admitted pursuant to interim orders, Mr. Chetan Sharma, the learned Additional Solicitor General of India was requested to assist the Court in finding a resolution. After extensive deliberations between the parties and before the Court, the learned ASG submitted the Status Note, which was reproduced in an order of the same date by which a batch of writ petitions was disposed of [W.P. (C) 2110/2021, [Glocal College of Unani Medical Science Hospital And Research Centre vs. Union of India & Others] and connected matters.]. The principal premise of the Status Note was that the impugned show cause notices and denial orders would stand withdrawn, and fresh show cause notices would be issued, consistent with the terms of the Status Note. The last date for admission of students in AYUSH colleges was also extended to 31.03.2021, to enable counseling to proceed after the decisions were rendered by the Union. Anot













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top