Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Pune Solapur Expressways Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Highway Authority of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. extension of arbitral tribunal's mandate (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no objection from respondent (Para 3) |
| 3. petition allowed; mandate extended (Para 4 , 5) |
(Video-Conferencing)
1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal, to conclude the proceedings and pass award therein.
2. I am informed that the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal expired on 19th July, 2021.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection.
4. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
5. The mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal shall stand extended by a period of six months, reckoned from 19th July, 2021.
Extension of Arbitral Tribunal's mandate is permissible under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when both parties consent.
The court can extend the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal under Section 29A(6) when there are no objections from the parties involved.
The court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for 18 months due to lack of objection from the respondent's counsel regarding ongoing arbitration disputes.
The court may extend the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal in the interest of justice, upon joint request of the parties, as provided in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court has the discretion to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal in the interest of justice.
Extension of an Arbitral Tribunal's mandate is justified when there are no objections from the opposing party, as per Section 29A(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
The court permitted a six-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate based on a joint application from both parties under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court upheld the extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, permitting additional time for award finalization.
The court affirmed that extraordinary circumstances, such as a pandemic, can justify extending the mandate of an arbitral tribunal under Section 29 A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court upheld the extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29 A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ensuring resolution of disputes while considering previous procedural del....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
