Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Jhabua Power Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for extension of arbitral mandate (Para 1) |
| 2. response without objection from respondent (Para 2) |
| 3. extension of arbitral tribunal's mandate granted (Para 3) |
| 4. application and petition granted (Para 4) |
1. This is an application under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal which is seized with the disputes between the parties.
2. Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection to extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal as sought.
3. Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal stands extended by a period of 18 months commencing today.
4. The petition alongwith the pending application stands allowed accordingly.
The court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for 18 months due to lack of objection from the respondent's counsel regarding ongoing arbitration disputes.
The court can extend the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal under Section 29A(6) when there are no objections from the parties involved.
Extension of an Arbitral Tribunal's mandate is justified when there are no objections from the opposing party, as per Section 29A(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Extension of Arbitral Tribunal's mandate is permissible under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when both parties consent.
The court permitted a six-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate based on a joint application from both parties under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court may extend the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal in the interest of justice, upon joint request of the parties, as provided in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court has the discretion to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal in the interest of justice.
The court upheld the extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29 A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ensuring resolution of disputes while considering previous procedural del....
The court affirmed that extraordinary circumstances, such as a pandemic, can justify extending the mandate of an arbitral tribunal under Section 29 A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
