SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Rakesh Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. summary of candidates' recruitment process. (Para 3)
2. arguments regarding lack of supplementary list. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's observations on delay and relevance of recruitment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. comparison with precedent cases based on prompt legal action. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. final order and dismissal of the petition. (Para 16)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM No.20569/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6552/2021

3. The 76 petitioners were candidates for recruitment as Constables in the respondents Railway Protection Force (RPF)/Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF), pursuant to the recruitment notification of November, 2011 for 17087 posts of Constables. The Select List of the said recruitment process was finally published on 17th September, 2014 and which did not contain the names of the petitioners.

4. The counsel for the petitioners has argued, that some other candidates, similarly placed as the petitioners, as well as some of the 76 petitioners herein, aggrieved from non-inclusion of their name in the Select List, in or about the year 2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top