Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JASMEET SINGH
N. Bhaskara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public interest litigation for policy enforcement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's stance on policy enforcement through litigation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. writ petition dismissed with costs. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
D.N.Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--This so called public interest litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:-
"(a) Direct Respondent No. 1 to uniformly implement National Litigation Policy launched on 23rd June, 2010 (Annexure P-2) along with progressive changes subsequently brought into such policy, if any, amongst all Ministries, Departments, Instruments, PSUs and Apparatus under Respondent's control, and similar directions to Respondent No. 2 in respect of State Litigation Policy, while determining a strict time schedule to be followed by the Respondents.
(b) Consequent upon aforesaid directions, kindly consider issuing appropriate rule/direction/practice direction to Registry of this Court to put in place and/or insist upon a conditionality, for registration of Government litigation and/or Government's defense or counter affidavit in any pending litigation, of an undertaking or certificate from Government litigant to the effect that the case/appeal/ defen
Public interest litigation cannot seek mere implementation of a policy; proper legal channels must address specific violations of the policy instead.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the pressing need for a comprehensive 'National Litigation Policy' to address the unchecked proliferation of frivolous litigation involving the Gov....
Public interest litigation requires clear identification of violations and proper parties; mere claims lack standing for enforcement action.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a National Litigation Policy to ensure responsible and efficient litigation by the Government and public sector undertakings, with a f....
Public interest litigation must not be driven by personal interests; it should address genuine social issues, with courts vigilant against misuse for private gain.
The court highlighted the importance of procedural technicalities in public interest litigation and the principles of issuing a writ of mandamus.
Procedural technicalities should take a back seat in public interest litigation, and the principles of issuing a writ of mandamus and the need for a demand for performance before its application are ....
Public Interest Litigation should be used for redressal of genuine public wrong or injury, and not for personal gain or publicity oriented motives.
The court emphasized the need for petitioners in public interest litigation to come with clean hands and be above suspicion, and laid down parameters to prevent misuse of public interest litigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
