Narender Kumar Ruria vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Narender Kumar Ruria – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge to adverse performance assessments. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claims of mala fide intent in evaluations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. context of disciplinary actions and performance reports. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. judicial review limitations on performance assessments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. court's rationale against interference in evaluations. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

CM 26119/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 8435/2021

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging his Annual Performance Assessment Report (hereinafter referred to as the `APAR') for the period 01.04.2012 to 31.03.2013 to the extent whereby the petitioner has been given adverse remarks by the Reporting Officer/Initiating Officer, respondent no. 4 in the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner further challenges his Part Performance Assessment Report (hereinafter referred to as the `PPAR') for the period 01.04.2013 to 11.10.2013 to the extent that the petitioner was numerically graded low. The petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLANarender Kumar Ruria – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Narender Kumar Ruria – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent