SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Syed Ahmar Ali Hashmi - Appellant
Versus
Union Public Service Commission - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5231 of 2020 and CM No. 18857 of 2020
Decided On : 11-07-2021




Contractual employees are entitled to an age relaxation of up to 5 years in direct recruitment as per Office Memorandum dated 11.06.2019 regardless of post classification.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Rules - Age relaxation for contractual employees - Office Memorandum dated 11.06.2019 provides for one-time age relaxation of up to 5 years for contractual employees when applying for direct recruitment in the same department - The court found that there is no distinction in applicability of age relaxation based on classifications of posts. (Paras 8, 10, 21)

(B) Judicial Review - The tribunal's dismissal of the applicant's plea was set aside - The applicant is entitled to consideration for age relaxation based on service in the same department. (Paras 4, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a contractual employee, sought age relaxation in a recruitment process for a higher post based on an Office Memorandum granting such relaxation to contractual employees in the same department, which was not followed in practice during the recruitment process.

Findings of Court:
The respondents failed to apply the relaxation as mandated by the Office Memorandum, and thus, the order dismissing the petitioner's application for age relaxation was found erroneous.

Issues: The primary issues were whether the OM dated 11.06.2019 applied to the post in question and the justification for the denial of age relaxation to the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the OM did not draw distinctions between Groups A, B, C in its applicability for age relaxation; therefore, the applicant was entitled to the benefit.

Result: The petition was disposed of with directions for the applicant's inclusion in the selection process.

Table of Content
1. details of the petitioner's employment and age relaxation policy. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner’s appeal to central administrative tribunal and proceedings. (Para 3 , 4)
3. key provisions of the office memorandum regarding age relaxation. (Para 6 , 7)
4. conditions for age relaxation eligibility outlined. (Para 8)
5. respondents' objections to the applicability of the age relaxation. (Para 9 , 10)
6. petitioner's arguments against the respondents' objections. (Para 11 , 12)
7. court’s observations on the distinction between posts not found in om. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
8. nature of posts and distinction for age relaxation applicability (Para 17)
9. court's reasoning for setting aside the previous order. (Para 19 , 20)
10. final directions and conclusion of the case. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Talwant Singh, J. The case of the petitioner is that, after acquiring the necessary qualification, he applied for the position of Junior Forensic/Assistant Chemical Examiner (Documents) with respondent nos. 2 and 3 and joined the said position on 18.04.2014 on contractual basis and still continuing in the same post.

2. On 11.06.2019, the respondent no. 2, i.e., Govt. of NCT of Delhi issued an Office Memorandum (OM) by which it granted age relaxation upto 5 years to contractual employees while applying against direct recruitment in the same department. This OM was reiterated and supplemented by instructions dated 10.07.2019 and it was specifically directed that the Departments/Undertakings will inform respondent no.1/ UPSC as well as DSSSB at the time of sending the requisition for recruitment. UPSC issued an advertisement for filling certain posts on behalf of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, including 4 vacancies for the post of Senior Scientific Officer (Documents), Forensic Science Laboratory, Home Department, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. But no relaxation upto 5 years in age was provided to the contractual employees of the same department, which was directly against the instructions contained in OM dated 11.06.2019. The last date to apply for the said post was 13.08.2020.

3. The petitioner approached the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) by filing OA No. 975/2020 on 30.07.2020 but vide order dated 07.08.2020, learned CAT was pleased to dismiss the OA in limine and feeling aggrieved by the said order, the present petition has been filed by the petitioner.

4. Notice in the writ petition was issued on 19.08.2020. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 have filed counter affidavit and on behalf of respondent no.1, i.e., UPSC, status report in the form of an affidavit was filed. The petitioner has filed rejoinder. Certain additional documents were also filed by the petitioner after taking leave of the Court.

5. We have heard arguments and our considered view is as under:

6. The entire case of the petitioner is based upon OM dated 11.06.2019; the said OM is reproduced hereunder:

"GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI

SERVICES DEPARTMENT-(BRANCH IV)

7th LEVEL, B-WING, DELHI SECRETARIAT,

I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002

    No.F.19(11)/2015-S-IV/1751-1756

Dated: 11.06.2019

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Sub: Relaxation in upper age limit to the contractual employees working under Government of NCT of Delhi at the time of regular appointment on direct recruitment basis

    The issue with regard to suitable relaxation in upper age limit to contractual employees, as a onetime measure, in Direct Recruitment has been examined in the light of various judicial pronouncements, DOPT guidelines, the opinion of Additional Solicitor General and in consultation with Finance Department and Law Department of GNCTD.

    2. The Competent Authority is pleased to order all Head of Departments to fill-up the posts as per the RECRUITMENT RULES and contractual employees hired against those posts may be given age relaxation as per the following modalities to be adopted on uniform basis for in respect of contractual employees under Government of NCT of Delhi.

    I






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top