Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Dhuleshwar Ghogra S/o Soma Ji Ghogra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Since the controversy involved in the present writ petitions is similar, therefore, they are being decided by this common order.
3. For brevity, the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16998/2022 “Jagdish Chand Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” are being taken into consideration for deciding the controversy involved in these cases.
4. Briefly, the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the respondent-Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department issued a Notification dated 20.09.2007 (Annex.1) for appointment on the post of Senior Technical and Gram Sahayak on contractual basis. The petitioner, being eligible, was appointed on the post of Gram Sahayak on the fixed remuneration of Rs.2,500/-p.m. He performed the work of Gram Sahayak for more than five years. In the year 2013, the respondents invited online applications for appointment
Contractual employees are entitled to age relaxation under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that judicial recruitment is governed by specific rules, and age relaxation cannot be sought based on a Government Resolution when the judicial ser....
The Government has power to grant relaxation in upper age limit on its own motion or upon getting intimation from any genuine or bona fide source can grant such relaxation subject to the condition th....
Where applications are called for prescribing a particular date as last date for filing applications, eligibility of candidates shall have to be judged with reference to that date and that date alone....
Ashish Kumar Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2018) 3 SCC 55
-
Read summaryMalik Mazhar Sultan V. U.P. Public Service Commission reported in 2006 (9) SCC 507
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.