Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Sabiha Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Jamia Millia Islamia – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's appointment details and context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. university's stance on appointments and agreements. (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 18 , 25) |
| 3. challenges regarding the merger of teaching positions. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments for regularization based on qualifications. (Para 39 , 41 , 43 , 45) |
| 5. court's judgment on regularization versus advertisement. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 85) |
| 6. conclusion of contempt petition and implications. (Para 86 , 88) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. At the outset I may state, vide this common order I shall decide, CONT. CAS(C) 602/2020, W.P.(C) 8532/2019, W.P.(C) 8454/2020, W.P.(C) 7864/2020, W.P.(C) 7928/2020, W.P.(C) 10702/2020 and respective applications connected therewith, as the issue raised in these petitions is similar and with identical facts, but narrated separately.
W.P.(C) 8532/2019
2. This Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"In light of the submissions made hereinabove the Petitioner humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
a. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent to regularise the Services of the Peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
