SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Amit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. bail application for petitioner. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's arguments against allegations. (Para 2)
3. state and complainant's arguments. (Para 3 , 4)
4. factual background of the case. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. analysis of dowry demand allegations. (Para 8)
6. phone call evidence analyzed. (Para 9 , 10)
7. court grants bail. (Para 11)
8. conclusion and order details. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. By this petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 468/2020 under Sections 304B/498A/34 IPC & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered at P.S. New Usmanpur.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in the FIR and even in the statements recorded under Sections 161 CrPC and 164 CrPC, of the father of the deceased, who is the complainant and maker of the FIR, allegations if any have been levelled against the mother and sister of the petitioner and not against the petitioner. The mother and sister of the petitioner have already been granted anticipatory bail. No overt act or any role has been attributed to the petitioner alleging abetment of suicide. Merely because just before the death, the petitioner and the deceased spoke on the mobile phone, it ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top