Accused may be granted bail when there are significant delays in trial, provided there is no risk of evidence tampering, despite serious accusations and improvements in witness testimony.

ORDER

(VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCING)

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail in case FIR No. 438/2018 under Sections 376D/354D/354/506 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Ranhola.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 18.7.2018 a case vide aforestated FIR was registered at P.S.Ranhola against Tejram Bhardwaj @ Pandit and Yogesh on the complaint of the prosecutrix Ms. P. It is alleged in the complaint that complainant was the neighbour of the accused Tejram Bhardwaj and her family got the place on rent with the help of accused in 2016, due to which, prosecutrix became familiar with accused Tejram and his family members, and she used to go at the residence of accused Tejram Bhardwaj. It is further alleged that accused to hold the hand of prosecutrix and use vulgar words whenever he found her alone. It is further alleged that one day at noon in the month of May-June 2017 accused Tejram Bhardwaj called prosecutrix at his residence on the pretext that his wife is calling her for some work, and after that, prosecutrix alone reached at the residence of accused Tejram. It is further alleged that when she entered in the house of accused he closed the door and prosecutrix found there one more person namely Yogesh (brother-in-law of Tejram). It is further alleged that accused Tejram took the prosecutrix forcefully in a room after pressing her mouth with his hand and raped her, and accused Yogesh made their video.

3. It is further alleged that accused Tejram threatened the prosecutrix that if she would disclose this incident to anyone, he would make the video viral. It is further alleged that accused on the pretext to circulate the video, blackmailed the prosecutrix and raped her many times. It is further alleged that prosecutrix changed her residence due to accused Tejram but he did not leave her and continued to blackmail her and raped her. It is further alleged that prosecutrix got pregnant and she informed the same to accused Tejram, who gave some medicines to her and threatened her to take them. It is further alleged that prosecutrix informed her mother about her pregnancy and act of accused Tejram, and when her parents questioned to accused Tejram, he threatened her parents and used abusive language.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and perused the status report filed on behalf of the State.

5. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is an innocent young man 30 years of age, and he is in judicial custody since 19.7.2019. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner had previously moved before this Court for bail which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 14.12.2018, and petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh bail application once statement of the victim is recorded. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that now the testimony of the victim has been recorded, and hence this application for grant of bail. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that in the testimony of the victim recorded before the trial court, there are major improvements, which have been made by the victim, with regard to the complaint on the basis of which FIR was registered and her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C

6. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has a right to speedy trial which has been enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In support of this contention, he has relied upon Criminal Appeal No. 227/2018 titled as Dataram Singh Vs. State of