SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Rohini Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner contests property tax assessment. (Para 2)
2. petitioner argues incorrect occupancy factor applied. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents acknowledge assessment errors. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court quashes tax notices, orders fresh assessment. (Para 7 , 8)
5. petition allowed; order to be communicated. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns demand notice dated 19.03.2021 along with the property tax bills dated 08.07.2021 and 06.08.2021 issued by respondent No.2 for the period 2020-2021 and 2021-2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the assessing authority has applied occupancy factor 3 whereas occupancy factor 1 should have been applied.

4. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been regularly filing the property tax returns and no show cause notice or hearing was granted to the petitioner prior to passing of the impugned order.

5. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that on account of an error some incorrect computation has been done in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top