SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Pravesh Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
Jatin Dhawan – Respondent


Table of Content
1. family settlement details and reliefs sought. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on suit maintainability and possession. (Para 7 , 8)
3. counterarguments from respondent and delay in petition. (Para 9 , 10)
4. court's observations on trial court's reasoning. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

CM No. 28120/2021(for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

CM(M) 556/2021 and CM No.28119/2021 (for interim relief)

3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 28th July, 2020 passed by the learned District Judge-03, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CS/210822/2016 whereby the application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (CPC), 1908 has been dismissed.

4. The case pleaded by the respondent/plaintiff in the suit was that there was a family settlement dated 28th January, 2012 that was executed between the parties to deal with the various properties as mentioned therein and that the petitioners/defendants did not abide by the terms of the said family settlement,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top