DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Pravesh Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
Jatin Dhawan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
CM No. 28120/2021(for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
CM(M) 556/2021 and CM No.28119/2021 (for interim relief)
3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 28th July, 2020 passed by the learned District Judge-03, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CS/210822/2016 whereby the application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (CPC), 1908 has been dismissed.
4. The case pleaded by the respondent/plaintiff in the suit was that there was a family settlement dated 28th January, 2012 that was executed between the parties to deal with the various properties as mentioned therein and that the petitioners/defendants did not abide by the terms of the said family settlement, which resulted in the respondent/plaintiff filing the suit from which the present petition arises. The following reliefs were sought in suit, (i) Declaration of ownership rights in terms of the aforesaid family settlement; (ii). declaration that the gift deeds dated 9th October, 2009 and 29th October, 2009
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.