SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Arjun Saili - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2109 of 2021 & CM Appls. 6152-53 of 2021 & CM Appl. 10302 of 2021
Decided On : 26-08-2021




Retention of original documents without explicit contractual authorization is illegal; respondents must return them while retaining the right to pursue recovery for training costs.

Headnote:(A) Regulations governing medical admission and Surety Bond agreements - Illegal retention of documents without clause authorizing such action - Prior judicial decisions cited establishing similar judgments - Respondents must return original documents within two weeks, without prejudice to their claim for recovery of training costs. (Paras 8, 16, 20)

(B) Judicial precedent - Previous judgments reaffirm the principle that the retention of documents cannot be justified in absence of a contractual basis within provided terms. (Para 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought the return of original documents submitted during admission to a medical training program, contending that their retention lacked legal basis after completion of the course. (Paras 2, 6, 10)

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the terms did not authorize document retention as security for payment, thus ordering their return while allowing for recovery actions. (Paras 15, 20)

Issues: Whether the respondents can lawfully retain the original documents of the petitioner pending payment of training costs was the principal issue. (Para 15)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that retention of documents was illegal without explicit terms permitting such action in the bond, echoing previous rulings affirming that claims must be pursued legally without arbitrary retention. (Paras 16, 20)

Result: Petition partially allowed; respondents directed to return documents within two weeks.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for document return and bond cancellation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. respondent's claim based on fraud and document retention. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. citations of relevant decisions supporting bond enforcement. (Para 11 , 12)
4. court's decision on document retention and ongoing recovery actions. (Para 13 , 14)
5. retention of original documents is unlawful; original documents must be returned. (Para 15 , 16 , 20)
6. final order on the case with directives and cost implications. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to return the original documents of the petitioner that were submitted with them by the petitioner at the time of his admission as a Post Graduate Trainee in MD (Anesthesia) at the Army Hospital (R&R).

2.1. The petitioner further prayed for an order directing the respondents to withdraw and cancel the Surety Bond dated 28.06.2014 executed by the petitioner.

3. By a subsequent application, being CM No. 10302 of 2021, the petitioner sought to add yet another prayer to the petition by seeking quashing of the letter dated 17.05.2018 issued by the respondent no. 2 that directed the petitioner to pay the cost of training from the date of his joining as MD (Anesthesia) till the date the petitioner was declared medically unfit, that is, an amount of Rs. 25,93,890/- (Rupees twenty- five lakhs ninety-three thousand eight hundred ninety).

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she confines her prayer in the present petition only to the prayer seeking the return of the original documents that were submitted by the petitioner at the time of his admission.

5. The petitioner had appeared in the All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination (AIPGMEE) and was selected for admission (Priority V candidate) as a Post Graduate Trainee in MD (Anesthesia) as a stipendiary candidate at AIPGMEE counselling (Extended), conducted by the respondent no. 1 on 20.06.2014.

6. The petitioner, on selection, was issued an admission offer dated 21.06.2014, which inter alia required the petitioner to execute a notarised bond agreement to serve as a Short Service Commission Officer (SSC service) for five years with the Armed Forces Medical Services or pay an amount of Rs. 25 lakhs to the Government of India, if unwilling to join upon the successful completion of the course. The petitioner was also to submit all original certificates, to be kept in the custody of the Academic Cell, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt., till the completion of the course. The relevant terms of the offer letter are reproduced hereinbelow:

"4. You are required to execute a notarized bond agreement by 27 Jun 2014 to serve as Short Service Commission Officers (SSC service) for 5 years with the Armed Forces Medical Services or pay an amount of Rs.25 Lakh to Govt. of India, if unwilling to join on successful completion of the course.

5. You will have to submit all Original Certificates which will be kept in the custody of Academic cell, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt till completion of your course."

7. In due compliance with the above stipulation, the petitioner executed a Surety Bond dated 28.06.2014, the terms and conditions of which are reproduced hereinbelow:

"1. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT (1) I, Dr Arjun Saili s/o Dr Arvind Saili resident of 963, Vikas Kunj New Delhi 110018, hereinafter called the PG Student (which expression shall include his/her heirs, executors, administrators and representatives ) Dr. Arti Devgon daughter of Air Cmde (Retd) Shri O.P Devgon resident of 963 Vikas Kunj New Delhi 110018, at present employed as Chief Medical Officer Central Health Services (CGHS) New Delhi, hereinafter called the 'Surety' (which expression shall include his heirs, executors, administrators and representative) are jointly and severally

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top