SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Rashmi Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India General Manager – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J.: (ORAL)

[PHYSICAL COURT HEARING]

CM APPL. 29414/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 9478/2021

2. On the previous date, i.e., 02.09.2021, we had passed the following order:

    "CM No.29414/2021

    1. Allowed, subject to the petitioner, filing legible copies of the dim annexures, before the next date of hearing.

    W.P.(C) No.9478/2021

    2. This writ petition is directed against the order, dated 24.9.2019.

    2.1. Essentially, the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that, her request for appointment, on compassionate ground, on account of the death of her husband has been rejected by the respondents, vide order dated 5.8.2015.

    2.2. The record shows that, the husband of the petitioner was removed from the service on 16.10.2003, after an inquiry was carried out. The order of the disciplinary authority, dated 16.10.2003, was not challenged by the husband of the petitioner, i.e., one, Mr. Sanjay Sinha.

    3. Ms. Bhawna Massay, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that the aforementioned order dated 16.10.2003, was not communicated to the petitioner.

    3.1. This plea advanced on behalf of the petitioner, seems completely unbelievable, as the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top