SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Akash Agrawal - Appellant
Versus
Reckitt Benckiser India Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
Arb.P. 744 of 2021
Decided On : 31-08-2021




The court highlighted the validity of arbitration agreements and the necessity of appointing an arbitrator to resolve disputes when one party fails to fulfill financial obligations under a contract.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(6) - Appointment of arbitrator - Petition filed for the appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes under a Consultancy Agreement due to non-payment of fees amounting to Rs.20,00,000/- - Respondent's failure to respond to multiple requests for payment. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Arbitration Agreement - Respondent agreed to refer disputes to arbitration following petitioner's legal notice demanding payment. (Paras 6-7)

(C) Conduct of Arbitration - Appointment of Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Gambhir, Advocate, as sole arbitrator, to ensure fair adjudication in accordance with established fee structures. (Paras 8-9)

Findings of Court:
The court appointed an independent arbitrator for the resolution of disputes and ensured compliance with relevant procedural requirements of the Act.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from the consultancy agreement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the parties' agreement to arbitration and proceeded to appoint an arbitrator to facilitate the resolution of the monetary dispute as stipulated.

Result: Petition disposes of awarding the appointment of an arbitrator.

Table of Content
1. dispute arises from consultancy agreement and payment issues (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. counsel requests appointment of arbitrator, agreed by both parties (Para 7)
3. appointment of arbitrator and compliance requirements established (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. case disposed of with arbitration order (Para 11)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under Consultancy Agreement dated 22.10.2019.

2. Petitioner claims to be a leading consultant having experience and specialised knowledge of more than 2 decades in the field of retail including online and institutional business, marketing and brand development. He is engaged in assisting and advising various corporate entities to expand their business and has experience of working with various Fortune 100 Global Brands. The respondent is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and is engaged in manufacturing/marketing of diverse range of health, homecare and hygiene products.

3. On 22.10.2019, the petitioner and the respondent entered into a Consultancy Agreement wherein petitioner was appointed as a Consultant of respondent for a fixed period from 22.10.2019 to 31.12.2020. However, certain differences and disputes arose between the parties, as the respondent failed to clear the variable fee amounting to Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lacs only) due on the petitioner under Consultancy Agreement.

4. According to the petitioner, several emails were addressed to the respondent requesting to clear the amount, however, respondent did not respond to the same. Thereafter, the respondent sent an e-mail to the petitioner on 27.03.2021 offering him a settlement amount of Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees Seven Lacs Fifty Thousand only) as a goodwill gesture against the due amount of Rs.20,00,000/-.

5. However, on 06.04.2021, petitioner served a legal notice to the respondent calling upon to pay a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- along with interest @ 18% p.a. within 7 days of receipt thereof, failing which the petitioner proposed name of a retired judge to act as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

6. In reply to the legal notice of petitioner, respondent sent a misconceived reply dated 28.04.2021, refuting the claim of petitioner and agreed to refer the disputes to arbitration.

7. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for appointment of sole independent arbitrator. The aforesaid submission is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.

8. Accordingly, Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Gambhir, Advocate (Mobile: 9810082347) is appointed sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitration shall be conducted under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC). The fee of the Arbitrator shall be in accordance with the schedule of fees prescribed under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) (Internal Management) Rules and Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators' Fees) Rules, 2018.

9. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

10. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Arbitrator for information.

11. The petition is accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top