Anita Kaushik vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Anita Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. initial appointment and challenges to designation (Para 2)
2. court's decision to allow fresh representation (Para 4)
3. disposal of the writ petition (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (ORAL):

[Physical Hearing]

CM No.29499/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 9512/2021 & CM No.29498/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner for taking additional documents on record]

2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30.03.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short `the tribunal') in O.A. No.651/2021.

2.1. It appears, the petitioner had approached the tribunal with regard to the rejection of her representations, concerning the change of designation of her post.

2.2. The respondents rejected the petitioner's representations, dated 19.08.2019 and 21.06.2019, vide communication dated 06.12.2019, which was what was assailed by her, before the tribunal.

2.3. The tribunal, having considered the matter, dismissed the aforementioned OA. The rationale given by the tribunal, is contained in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the impugned order, dated 30.03.2021. For the sake of convenience, the said paragraphs, are extracted he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document