SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Irfan @ Chhenu – Appellant
Versus
State, NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments from the petitioner’s counsel. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments from the state’s counsel. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court’s analysis of arguments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. conclusion and dismissal of bail application. (Para 17)

ORDER

(VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCING)

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 592/2017, under Sections 302 /307/120B/34 IPC & 25/27 of ARMS ACT registered at P.S. Jafrabad, Delhi.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on 22.10.2017 at about 9:15 PM, Md. Sajid S/o Jalil Ahmed & Sajid S/o Shadik were standing at Braham Puri Road Delhi. Then Wajid & Faiz came there on Scooty. In the meanwhile, Rashid @ Golu, Bada Imran, Mumtaz and their other three associates came there on two motorcycles and chased down Wajid & Faiz. On seeing them, Wajid & Faiz turned back their Scooty. In the meantime one of them fired at Wajid & Faiz and one bullet hit Fiaz as a result of which the Scooty got imbalanced and stopped. Faiz stood there and Wajid started running on Brahampuri Ro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top