IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, J.
Shafkat Hussain & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
Public Prosecutors Additional Session Court Doda - Respondent
Bail App. No. 194 of 2020
Decided On : 04-08-2021
Bail - Criminal Conspiracy - Sections 302/307/458/436/511/201/120-B RPC and 7/27 Arms Act - The court discussed the prosecution story, the nature of evidence, and the stage of the trial. It highlighted the requirement of establishing conspiracy, the inadvisability of detailed exploration of evidence at the bail stage, and the dissimilarity of the petitioners' case with that of the other accused who were granted bail.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners are facing trial for various serious offences including criminal conspiracy and arms act violations. The prosecution alleges their involvement in a militant attack on a police picket resulting in injuries and death of police personnel.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners were not entitled to bail at the current stage of the trial, considering the nature of evidence and the remaining witnesses to be examined. It emphasized the requirement of establishing conspiracy and the inadvisability of detailed exploration of evidence at the bail stage.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to bail given the stage of the trial, the nature of evidence, and the alleged involvement in a criminal conspiracy.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that at the current stage of the trial, the petitioners were not entitled to bail, emphasizing the need to establish conspiracy and the inadvisability of detailed exploration of evidence at the bail stage.
Final Decision: The application for bail by the petitioners was found to be without merit and dismissed. The trial Court was requested to expedite the trial for a swift conclusion.
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners along with others are facing trial in case FIR No. 35/2017 registered in Police Station, Gandoh for offences under Sections 302/307/458/436/511/201/120-B RPC and 7/27 Arms Act which is pending disposal before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Doda (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial Court').
2. Before filing the instant application, the petitioners along with two others had moved a similar application for bail before the trial Court which the trial Court rejected vide its order dated 19.03.2020 in so far as the petitioners herein are concerned. The two other accused, namely, Bashir Ahmed and Altaf Hussain were, however, enlarged on bail by the trial Court. Feeling aggrieved and with a view to seek their enlargement on bail in the aforesaid case, the petitioners have moved this Court through the medium of instant application.
3. Before I advert to the grounds urged by the petitioners seeking concession of bail, it would be appropriate to take note of the prosecution story and the outcome of the trial so far held in the instant case:-
From the evidence collected and also the call details, it was found that all the accused persons including the petitioners herein were in contract with each other since long and were also in touch with each other even on the day of occurrence. It further revealed that Abdul Rashid alias Abdullah was a LeT militant and was involved in so many militant activities. In the year 2008, he had surrendered before the Territorial Army from where he had come in contact with Bashir Ahmed and two other accu
The requirement of establishing conspiracy and the inadvisability of detailed exploration of evidence at the bail stage.
The severity of the charges and the prima facie satisfaction of the court in support of the charge are crucial in deciding bail applications in serious offences.
Point of Law : Grant of Bail - Petitioner cannot be made to languish behind bars for a longer period of time, and that veracity of allegations levelled against him can be tested during trial.
Grant of Bail - circumstances which are peculiar to the accused should also be a factor that must be taken into consideration while granting or refusing bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of evidence, pending charges, and the expected trial duration in the decision to grant bail.
The court established that in the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the crime scene, bail should be granted, especially when trial proceedings are expected to be lengthy.
Grant of Bail - Injuries/Wounds/Weapons - Murder - Petitioners even though were present as members of a mob at Gali No. 1 Akhadewali gali after 11.00 PM when some members of this mob were armed howev....
The court upheld the trial court's decision to frame charges based on sufficient circumstantial evidence and confessions, emphasizing the admissibility of evidence under the Evidence Act.
Theory of close-range shot is just a conjecture of the investigating agency and is not based on scientific fact.Simply because copper like pieces were found near the exit wound of the body, as per th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.