SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Alka Sachdeva – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Gupta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eviction petition filed under drc act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. submission of lease deeds and arguments regarding tenant status. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's observations on application of law regarding compensation. (Para 7 , 8)
4. ratio drawn from atma ram properties case on compensation. (Para 9 , 10)
5. determining date and rate for occupation charges. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. assessment based on comparatives from lease deeds. (Para 14 , 15)
7. affirmation of charges and due dates for payment. (Para 16 , 17)
8. court directions and request for expedited appeal decision. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 23rd September, 2021 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT), Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in RCT Appeal No. 01/2021 to the extent that the use and occupation charges have been fixed @ Rs.270/- per month.

2. The brief facts necessary for deciding the present petition are as follows:

2.1. The eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act) was filed on behalf of the petitioner landlord on 15th April, 2015 i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top