SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Ashok Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Prem Chand Gupta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court expresses ability to resolve by consent. (Para 1)
2. history of the litigation between the parties. (Para 2)
3. supreme court precedent on mesne profits clarified. (Para 3)
4. issues regarding lease deeds and market rent evaluation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
5. agreed remand to rct for de novo consideration. (Para 9)
6. disposal of petition with specific instructions for rct. (Para 10)
7. scheduling of appearance before rct. (Para 11)
8. acknowledgment of open questions and cost orders. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

C.Hari Shankar, J. (Oral)

1. It is gratifying to note that without entering into intricacies of facts and figures, this Court is in a position to dispose of the present petition, by consent between learned Counsel.

2. Given the nature of the order that I am passing today, it is not necessary to enter into the history of the litigation between the parties. Suffice it to state that, by an order dated 1st June, 2019, passed in E.P. M 29527/16, the learned Additional Rent Controller ("the learned ARC") directed eviction of the petitioner from the property of the respondent, under the Proviso to Section 14(2) read with Clauses 14(1)(a) and (j) of the Delhi Rent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top