SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, AMIT BANSAL
Anshul Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent


Table of Content
1. public interest litigation seeks constitutional compliance. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's request for timely action on representation. (Para 2)
3. court directs authorities to decide representation per law. (Para 3)
4. writ petition disposed with observations. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

CM APPL. 32477/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to only just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 10534/2021

1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred for the following prayers:

    "i. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature thereby passing order or direction to the Respondents to remove the unconstitutional sections from the statute.

    ii. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature thereby passing order or direction to the Respondents to make available the relevant amended criminal law books/bare acts and the Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the respective High Courts of the State that would publicize the obligations & responsibilities of police officers to increase awareness about different laws and sections to police staff and complainants who come to PS.

    iii. Pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top