SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Attarkali – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenging notice issued to deceased (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's analysis on notice validity (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. valid notice according to legal representation (Para 5 , 6)
4. quashing of the impugned notice (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)

The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the notice dated 30.03.2019 issued under Section 148 of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') in the name of Sh. Maharaj Singh, deceased husband of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner asserts that Late Sh.Maharaj Singh expired on 26.07.2014 and therefore, the impugned notice, having been issued in the name of a dead person, is invalid.

3. The petitioner in support of her submission has also placed on record the death certificate of Late Sh.Maharaj Singh.

4. Notice of this petition was issued to the respondent on 04.01.2021. Further time to file the counter affidavit was granted to the respondent vide orders dated 10.05.2021 and 04.08.2021. However, the counter affidavit has not been filed till date.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner places r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top