JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (ORAL):--This writ petition is directed against the order dated 09.07.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short `the tribunal') in O.A.No.2652/2017.

2. The petitioners before us, presently, are aggrieved by the fact that, they have not been considered for appointment to the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (Computer Science) (Post Code 192/14) [hereafter referred as "TGT (Computer Science)"].

2.1 We may also note that, apart from the official respondents, some private respondents are also arrayed as parties to the instant petition. While Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate, represents the petitioners, Ms. Sangita Rai, Advocate, represents some of the private respondents. The private respondents, we are told, are arrayed as respondent nos.4 to 22 in the writ petition.

3. It would also be relevant to note that, some of the private respondents had approached this court on an earlier occasion, which resulted in the Division Bench of this court passing a judgment, on 21.12.2018. This judgment was rendered in W.P.(C.) No.13885/2018, titled Dayanand & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

3.1. Interestingly, Ms. Rai represented the petitio