SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eligibility for study leave under ugc regulations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments for associate professor eligibility (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. ugc's stance against associate eligibility for study leave (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. judicial interpretation of statutory provisions (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. court's reasoning on interpretations of study leave regulations (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. importance of following ugc guidelines (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. counterarguments regarding past interpretations and application (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. court's final ruling on the applicability of study leave petition (Para 29)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

    "In view of the abovementioned facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

    (a) May issue Writ of mandamus against the Respondent No.1 to grant to the Petitioner study leave enabling him to proceed on the Assignment of Technical Co-ordinator at CERN-Geneva in terms of 'UGC Regulations On Minimum Qualifications For Appointment Of Teachers And Other Academic Staff In Universities And Colleges And Measure F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top