Dharamveer Sharma vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Dharamveer Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. nature of allegations in the fir (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding false implications and evidence (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. legal standards for exercising inherent powers (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. court’s reasoning on the merit of allegations (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. dismissal of petition based on legal findings (Para 21)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 218/2018 registered under Sections 498A/323/354D/506/509/34 IPC at Police Station New Friends Colony, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom, as well as stay of the proceedings pending before the Trial Court in SC No. 351/2019.

2. Briefly stated, the facts as narrated in the petition are:-

(i) Petitioner No. 3 (Sunny Sharma) got married to respondent No. 2 (Vipra Sharma) in the year 2007 and two children-one daughter, namely `AA', and one son, namely `AD', were born out of the marriage. Petitioner No. 1 (Dharamveer Sharma) & petitioner No. 2 (Nishi Sharma) are the parents of petitioner No. 3 (Sunny Sharma).

(ii) On 18.08.2018, respondent No. 2 filed a complaint with the SHO, Poli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANOJ KUMAR OHRIDharamveer Sharma – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Dharamveer Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent