GM Modular Private Limited vs Syska Led Lights Private Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
GM Modular Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Syska Led Lights Private Limited – Respondent

Table of Content
1. injunction for design infringement (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
2. arguments on design originality (Para 9 , 10)
3. trademark and design overlap (Para 11 , 12)
4. document filing and presumption (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. definition of trademark usage (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. disclosure in public domain (Para 21 , 22)
7. pre-publication arguments (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
8. cancellation grounds for designs (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
9. dismissal of appeal (Para 29 , 30)
10. open questions for further adjudication (Para 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

C.M. APP No. 46566/2022 (seeking exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

FAO (OS) (COMM) 302/2022 & C.M. APP No. 46565/2022 (seeking stay)

3. Issue notice.

4. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the Respondent.

5. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal today itself.

6. Appellant impugns order dated 22.08.2022 whereby the application filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC has been dismissed and the application filed by the respondent/defendant under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC has been allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELAGM Modular Private Limited – AppellantVersusSyska Led Lights Private Limited – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
GM Modular Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Syska Led Lights Private Limited – Respondent