Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
TNSI Retail Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Uniworld Logistics Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment of arbitrator under arbitration law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute over money transfers and claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondent's defense on claims and invoices. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's role in appointing an arbitrator. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. arbitration process directions and conclusion. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. Petitioner, a Private Limited Company, incorporated with Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of importing, distribution, marketing and sale of travel-oriented retail products such as packaged food items, books, gifts, confectionery, novelty items, etc. under the brand name "WH Smith" throughout the territory of India.
3. On the other hand, respondent is also a Private Limited Company, incorporated under the Companies Act and is involved in the business of providing logistical and warehousing services.
4. As per the version of petitioner, petitioner and respondent executed the Warehouse Agreement dated 01.02.2016 in which petitioner a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
