Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Totem-Premco (JV) – Appellant
Versus
Rail Vikas Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitral award issued on prior proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contract establishment and bid acceptance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. contractual obligations and progress issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. termination notice and joint meetings. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. arbitrator's conclusion and dissent. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. parties' arguments on tribunal's findings. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. court's observations on contractual interpretation. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 8. no ground found for setting aside award. (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 63) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') impugning an Arbitral Award dated 03.06.2020 (hereinafter `the impugned award') delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three Arbitrators, Mr. M. Ravindra, Major General K.T. Gajria (Retired) and Justice (Retired) Jaspal Singh, as the Presiding Arbitrator. Whilst Justice (Retired) Jaspal Singh and Mr. M. Ravindra delivered the impugned award by majority, Major General K.T. Gajria (Retired) entered a dissenting opinion on 03.0
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
