Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Millennium School – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Dawar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of the arbitration petition and arbitral award (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of parties' business and claims (Para 3 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. description of the agreement and service terms (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. summary of claims and awards by arbitral tribunal (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. petitioner's arguments against the arbitral findings (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. court's analysis of contract termination validity (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. clarification on grounds for termination as per agreement (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. evidence admissibility and deficiencies addressed (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. examining findings on grounds for termination (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 10. evaluation of arbitral tribunal's decisions on claims (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 11. court's findings on extra cab charges (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 12. discussion on the interest rate awarded by the tribunal (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 13. final disposition of the petition (Para 59 , 60) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act') imp
Termination of a contractual agreement during a lock-in period is invalid unless justified under specific contractual provisions, emphasizing the need to adhere to agreed terms for contract terminati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the termination of an agreement must be in accordance with the terms of the agreement, and the grounds for termination must be within the agre....
Arbitral Tribunal has wide discretion in awarding interest and this Court is unable to accept that the award of interest at the rate of 18% is manifestly erroneous and warrants any interference in th....
The arbitral tribunal's decision to deny claims for damages due to lack of supporting evidence is valid under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minimal judicial interfer....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal must be based on evidence and material on record, and the Court will not interfere with the award unless....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited grounds for challenging arbitral awards under Section 34 of the A&C Act, emphasizing the principles of public policy and fundamental In....
The Court emphasized the limited scope of jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Act and the need for evidence to support claims for loss of profit.
Arbitral awards are not subject to interference unless they exhibit patent illegality; the interpretation of contractual obligations falls within the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
