SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Laxmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Inder Dev Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 15th March, 2021 passed by the learned Rent Control Tribunal, District-West, Principal District & Sessions Judge (RCT), whereby the appeal, filed by the petitioner against the dismissal of her objections to the execution of the order of eviction against the respondent No.2, were dismissed.

2. The facts as are relevant for the disposal of the present petition are that the respondent No.1 had filed a suit for eviction against the respondent No.2, numbered as 53/2008, under Section 14 (1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC) claiming to be the landlord of property measuring 55 sq. yards being part of property No.10/13, Gali No.9, Anand Parbat, Delhi. The learned ARC passed the eviction order dated 24th March, 2012 and vide subsequent order dated 7th April, 2012, the benefit under Section 14 (2) of the DRC Act was denied as the respondent No.2 had not complied with the order dated 14th July, 2005 passed under Section 15 (1) of the DRC Act. The respondent No.2 preferred an appeal being RCT No.28/2012 which was also dismissed by the learned ARCT (West) vide order dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top