SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Rajinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of eviction case against tenant (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both parties (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis of the case and legal standards (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. decision to dismiss the appeal (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment dated 01st June, 2020 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) in RCT No. 9/2016 , whereby the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner/tenant under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act) against the order dated 20th September, 2012 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) allowing the eviction proceedings against the petitioner/tenant, has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts necessary to the extent relevant for deciding the present petition are set out below:

2.1 Eviction proceedings were initiated on behalf of the respondent No.1/landlord in respect of shop measuring 12' X 7' feet situated in property bearing No. B-347, Raghubir Nagar, Delhi-110027, let out to the father of the petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs.625/- per month, later enhanced to Rs.687.50 per month. The premise

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top