SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Shakuntala – Appellant
Versus
Rani – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails judgment dated 10th July, 2019 passed by the learned Rent Control Tribunal in RCT 09/19 (Shakuntala v. Rani).

Facts

2. Rani is the landlady and Shakuntala the tenant, in respect of the premises comprising a flat on the second floor of the property bearing no. C-110/12, Ganesh Nagar, New Delhi-110018 ("the tenanted premises", hereinafter).

3. These proceedings emanate from Eviction Petition ARC 25248/16, instituted by the respondent against the petitioner. The respondent, in the said petition, sought to evict the petitioner from the tenanted premises under clause (a) of the proviso to Section 14(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 ("the DRC Act"). The statutory provision in question would be referred to hereinafter, as Section 14(1)(a), for convenience.

4. The respondent asserted, in the eviction petition, that the petitioner had been inducted in the tenanted premises as a tenant in 1998 at a monthly rent of Rs. 3,000/-, which was paid by her for about two years from the date of commencement of tenancy, whereafter the petitioner discontinued payment of rent. A demand notice, dated 22

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top