Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Shakuntala – Appellant
Versus
Rani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant eviction proceedings initiated due to rent default (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's contention regarding rent amount modification (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. supervisory jurisdiction of high court under article 227 (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. final ruling on dismissal of the petition (Para 18 , 19) |
1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails judgment dated 10th July, 2019 passed by the learned Rent Control Tribunal in RCT 09/19 (Shakuntala v. Rani).
Facts
2. Rani is the landlady and Shakuntala the tenant, in respect of the premises comprising a flat on the second floor of the property bearing no. C-110/12, Ganesh Nagar, New Delhi-110018 ("the tenanted premises", hereinafter).
3. These proceedings emanate from Eviction Petition ARC 25248/16, instituted by the respondent against the petitioner. The respondent, in the said petition, sought to evict the petitioner from the tenanted premises under clause (a) of the proviso to Section 14(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 ("the DRC Act"). The statutory provision in question would be referred to hereinafter, as Section 14(1)(a), for convenience.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
