ORDER :

(Inderjeet Singh, J.)

Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner (hereinafter to be referred as "Sub-Tenant") challenging the order dated 21.04.2022 passed by the learned Appellate Rent Tribunal, Ajmer, whereby the appeal filed on behalf of the Sub-tenant against the order dated 25.09.2018 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, Ajmer was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents (to be referred as "Landlord") filed eviction application against one Shri Om Prakash Gupta and Sub-tenant Laxmi Swaroop Mathur on the ground of default in payment of rent, material alteration, sub-letting and parting with possession. The learned Rent Tribunal on the basis of pleadings of the parties framed the following issues:-

^^1 & vk;k vthZnkj o izR;FkhZ la[;k 1 ds e/; edku ekfyd o fdjk;snkj ds lEcU/k gSA

2 & vk;k vthZnkj /kkjk 6 fdjk;k fu;a=.k vf/kfu;e ds rgr fdjk;k iqujhf{kr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA ;fn gka rks dc ls vkSj fdruk\

3 & vk;k izR;FkhZ ds n~okjk pkj ekg ls vf/kd vof/k dh fdjk;k jkf'k ckotwn uksfVl fnuakd 27-08-2005 dh izkfIr ds i'pkr Hkh oknxzLr ifjlj dk fdjk;k vthZnkj dks ,sMk ugha dj fdjk;k vnk;xh esa O;frdze djhr fd;k x;k gSA blfy, bl vk/kkj ij vthZnkjx.k izR;FkZx.k ls fookfnr ifjlj dk [kkyh dCtk izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS\

4 & vk;k izR;FkhZ ds n~okjk fcuk fdlh ;qfDr;qDr dkju ds ewy vthZ izLrqr djus ls 6 ekg iwoZ ls oknxzLr ifj"kj dk mi;ksx miHkkx ugha fd;k tk jgk gSA blfy, bl vk/kkj ij vthZnkj] izR;FkhZ ls oknxzLr ifjlj dk fdjk;k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS\

5 & vk;k izR;FkhZ la[;k 1 us fcuk vthZnkj dh vuqefr ds izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dks oknxzLr ifjlj mifdjk;s ij ns fn;k gSA blfy, bl vk/kkj ij vthZnkjx.k izR;FkhZx.k ls fookfnr ifjlj dk [kkyh dCtk izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS\

6 & vk;k izR;FkhZ ds n~okjk oknxzLr ifjlj esa fcuk vthZnkj dh vuqefr ds lkjHkwr ifjorZu dj uqDlku djhr fd;k gSA blfy, bl vk/kkj ij vthZnkjx.k izR;FkhZx.k ls fookfnr ifjlj dk [kkyh dCtk izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS\

7 & vuqrks"k\**

3. Thereafter, after recording of the evidence of the landlord and tenant as well as the sub-tenant, the learned Rent Tribunal allowed the eviction application vide its order dated 25.09.2018. Being aggrieved by the order dated 25.09.2018 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, the Sub-tenant filed the appeal before the learned Rent Appellate Tribunal, Ajmer, which was dismissed by the learned Appellate Rent Tribunal vide its order dated 21.04.2022. Hence, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 21.04.2022.

4. Mr. M.M. Ranjan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Sub-tenant submits that the petitioner is not a sub-tenant or tress-passer in the property rather he has purchased the property in dispute by oral agreement made in the year 1989. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that the sale deed was also executed with regard to disputed premises in the year 2014 by the Power of Attorney Holder of the landlords. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that the learned Rent Tribunal has wrongly decided the issue No.5 with regard to sub-tenancy in favour of the landlord and findings given by the learned Rent Tribunal on the issues with regard to arrears of the rent is also perverse as the petitioner had purchased the property in dispute and thereafter, he has constructed the house over the said property. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that the learned Rent Tribunal has wrongly applied the explanation to Section 9 E of the RENT CONTROL ACT , 2001 (hereinafter to be referred as "The Act of 2001"). Learned Senior Counsel further submits that the Civil Suit with regard to cancellation of the sale deed is pending and till decision of the said suit