Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Bhaskar Singha – Appellant
Versus
Monika – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of the revision petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. financial status of parties is key to maintenance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. earning capacity vs actual income in maintenance. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. division of family resources for maintenance. (Para 8) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition with conditional adjustment. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--The present revision petition has been filed under Section 401 Cr.P.C. read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner assailing the order dated 22.07.2021 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, vide which the petitioner has been directed to pay interim maintenance of Rs.6,500/- per month to the respondent till the disposal of the petition.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the parties were married on 19.06.2020 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies in Agra, U.P. No child was born out of this wedlock. Due to matrimonial disputes, the parties are not residing together since 14.07.2020. It is further submitted that MT No. 293/2020, in which the order on maintenance has been passed, was filed only to creat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
