SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Aarti Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kunal Bhagi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. marriage was solemnized and no children born. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding maintenance and financial conditions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis on evidence and prior decisions. (Para 6 , 7)
4. determination of interim maintenance calculation. (Para 8)
5. concluding orders on maintenance and application. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--The present revision petition has been filed under Section 19 (4) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. assailing the order dated 03.10.2019 passed in Interim Application No. 01/19 in MT. No. 1053/17 by the learned Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi.

2. Brief facts of the case, as noted by the Family Court in the impugned order, are as under:

    "5....It is not in dispute that marriage of the petitioner was solemnised with respondent as per Hindu rites and customs on 24.04.2016 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. The marriage was duly consummated but no child is born from their wedlock. It is also not in dispute that there are certain differences between the parties, due to which they have been living separately.

    6. The petitioner has c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top