SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Sneha Choudhaury – Appellant
Versus
Sahitya Akademi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. confidentiality of parties' identities (Para 1 , 2)
2. requests for compliance and compensation (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal proceedings initiated by parties (Para 5 , 22 , 32 , 56)
4. details of allegations of sexual harassment (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. jurisdiction of the local and internal committees (Para 33 , 34 , 41 , 60)
6. arguments against maintainability of petitions (Para 59 , 61 , 84)
7. definitions under the sexual harassment act (Para 67 , 68 , 71 , 80)
8. termination order findings (Para 97 , 101)
9. doctrine of necessity in procedural contexts (Para 104 , 105)
10. final orders and consequences (Para 108 , 109)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. In view of Section 16 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the name of the Petitioner in W.P. (C) 1103 of 2020 shall be kept confidential and she would be referred to as the "aggrieved woman" and similarly the name of the officer against whom complaint has been made shall be kept confidential and he would be referred to as the "Secretary".

2. Further, in order to conceal the identity of the aggrieved woman and the Secretary, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top