SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Moser Baer India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning an order dated 28.12.2016 passed by the Board of Approval, whereby the petitioner's appeal against an order dated 18.04.2016 passed by the Unit Approval Committee, NOIDA SEZ was rejected. The petitioner also prays that the petitioner may be allowed benefits under Section 26 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 (hereafter `the SEZ Act') in respect of maintenance and duty free imports of raw materials and consumables for operation and maintenance of the power plant (hereafter `O&M benefits'). In addition, the petitioner also prays that it should be allowed duty free transfer of surplus power generated by it to the Export Oriented Units (hereafter `EOU').

Factual Context

2. The petitioner is a company, inter alia, engaged in generation of electricity, which is captively consumed and also supplied to other units in the Special Economic Zone (SEZ Units). The petitioner had submitted its proposal for seeking approval for its power generating unit in MBIL-SEZ. The said proposal was accepted and by a Letter of Approval dated 08.10.2009 (hereafter `the LoA'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top