Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Bivas Dey Niyogi – Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks order regarding noc for lift installation. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding the status of the noc and litigation context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court acknowledges notice and condition of stay. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. direction for timely decision on petitioner's representation. (Para 8) |
| 5. petition disposed with provision for remedies. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
CM APPL. 34245/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 11107/2021 & CM APPL. 34244/2021 (for stay)
1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to decide the representations dated 09.08.2021 and 23.09.2021 of the petitioner and keep in abeyance the NOC dated 30.09.2016, granted by it to the petitioner for construction and installation of a lift.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by letter dated 30.09.2016, respondent had granted NOC for installation of a common lift in the subject property. The permission was valid for a period of five years.
3. He submits that clause 4 provides that in case of any court case, NOC granted by the SDMC would become inoperative and would be kept in abeyance till final outcome of the co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
