SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Dimeco – Appellant
Versus
Central Organisation for Modernization of Workshops – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[Hearing held through video conferencing]

Vibhu Bakhru, J. (Oral)--The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter `the A&C Act'), inter alia, praying as under:

    "i) grant an interim injunction restraining the Respondents from taking any coercive measures based on the Final Rejection Memo bearing No. Mech/M&P/2300/11 dated 26.08.2021 issued by Respondent No.2;

    ii) pass an ex-parte ad interim order in terms of prayer (I) above;

    iii) award costs of this Petition to the Petitioner;"

2. Respondent no.1 (hereafter `COFMOW') had invited a Global Bid Invitation Notice to tender for the supply of `Cut to Length Line machine on turnkey basis' (hereafter `the CTL Machine'). The said Notice Inviting Tender was published on 30.04.2010. On 01.07.2010, the petitioner (a French company) submitted its bids through its Indian agent. The bids were opened on 02.07.2010 and the petitioner was found to be the Lowest Bidder (L-1). It is stated that between September, 2010 to August, 2011, COFMOW sought certain clarifications and the same were provided. Thereafter, on 02.09.2011, COFMOW issued a Letter of Acceptance. There

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top